Re: asmail

Albert Dorofeev albert@mail.dma.be
Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST)


Rob Hoyle writes:
> > 
> >     USER   PID %CPU %MEM  NI   VSZ   RSS  SHRD  TT STAT   TIME COMMAND
> > albert     258  2.3  2.1   0  2000  1032   856   1 S      0:26 asmail 
> > 
> Umm.
> Not on my end.
> I have asmail 0.5 I believe..
> it is NOT swallowed into a wharf...and, currently, its animating, because
> I have New mail.
> USER       PID %CPU %MEM  SIZE   RSS TTY STAT START   TIME COMMAND
> robho      317  0.0  0.8  1920  1136   1 S    21:14   0:05 asmail

while animating:

    USER   PID %CPU %MEM  NI   VSZ   RSS  SHRD  TT STAT   TIME COMMAND
albert     227  4.6  2.1   0  2000  1032   856   1 S      0:04 asmail

I have asmail 0.5 too. In fact, I tried to recompile
the asmail from the afterstep 1.0 distribution and
it gave the same results. My asmail is swallowed in
the Wharf. Wharf problems?

Albert


-- 
Albert Dorofeev albert@mail.dma.be http://bewoner.dma.be/Albert/
fingerprint = C9 49 D0 F3 41 FA 8C D8  E9 5C 6A D4 F1 6D 65 15
Anything good in life is either illegal, immoral or fattening.

--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html