NO_TEXTURE

Ethan (allanon@crystaltokyo.com)
Wed, 2 Sep 1998 17:32:07 -0700 (PDT)



Would it be reasonable to remove NO_TEXTURE?  It doesn't use any unusual 
features, and when I tested AS with NO_TEXTURE off, it made no difference 
in memory usage!

Some parts of AfterStep are becoming very difficult to read/modify because 
of the tangle of ifdef-guarded code.  It would be useful to take a look at 
removing some of those defines, IMO.  Some options could become run-time, 
and perhaps some (like NO_TEXTURE) could be removed entirely.

Opinions?

----
Ethan Fischer
allanon@crystaltokyo.com
http://members.xoom.com/allanon1