Re: aterm and menu vote

Benjamin J. Tracy (tracy@wsicorp.com)
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:43:35 -0500 (EST)



Isn't a compile time flag whether or not to have the menu?  

If not, what's the difference in memory footprint between having it and
not having it?  (I assume that that would be the reason to remove it.. 
:) )

Ben

On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, David Mihm wrote:

> 
> 	Sasha wishes to put to a vote here on the mailing list if people
> would like to keep the menubar (like rxvt) in aterm.  The consensus on the
> irc channel (#afterstep on efnet) is to toss the menubar.  Now here is
> everyone else's chance to voice their opinion.
> 
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | d a v i d  @  m i h m                         reality.sys corrupt! |
> | davemann-at-ionet-dot-net                    reboot universe(y,n)? |
> | [www|ftp].the-site.dsis.net                             ICQ:906859 |
> | [www|ftp].the-site.loonybin.net                                    |
> | webmaster-at-afterstep-dot-org      ftpmaster-at-afterstep-dot-org |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>   Key fingerprint  = E4 90 15 ED E5 9F 18 8A B0 CC FF 68 61 36 4A 6F
> 
> 
> --
>    WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
>    FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
>    MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html
> 


--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html