RE: Patch Numbering Sceme [was RE: WinList / Transparent Pixmaps

Mark Ogden (root@poggy.globalnet.co.uk)
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:52:53 +0000 (GMT)


Now correct me if I'm wrong but I think Ben's just referring to the fact
that 42 is the answer to the ultimate question!

Markypoos

On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Bruce Richardson wrote:

> David Mihm wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Benjamin J. Tracy wrote:
> >!
> >! Would 1.7.37 patch 5 be equivalent to 1.7.42 which would obviously be 
> the
> >! ultimate answer to all window manager issues, no?.
> >
> >	I'm not sure I understand what you are implying here.
> 
> I think Benjamin might just be running AS on SuSE, which numbered its first 
> experimental release 0.42 and its first commercial release 4.2, for reasons 
> best known to Douglas Adams.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
>    WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
>    FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
>    MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html
> 
> 


--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html