I have recieved a handfull of votes on this subject. Before I close it out and impose the decision, I wanted to make one more call for votes. I will close voting out this Friday Jan 14. Here is the original call for votes: >OK, since there have been two request to munge the Reply-To and three request >not to munge the Reply-To I will put it to a vote. First, go read >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html. Then send your vote to me in >a personal mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. I will summarize the votes back to the list >and take any necessary action to comply with the popular vote. > >Send me a vote for either: > >1. Leave the Reply-To header unmodified with the original sender's address. > >2. Change the Reply-To header to the mailing list. > >In either case, I will be leaving the "X-Mailing-List: as-users" header. That >doesn't hurt anyone and helps several. I will also use the "X-as-users-dont- >resend: " header in my efforts to prevent further mail loops. Further, I have >changed the message footer to be smaller. I hope more people are happy than >unhappy. -- (__) Doug Alcorn | program == list of computer instructions oo / email@example.com | firmware == program that is not user modifiable |_/ http://www.lathi.net | software == program that a user can modify Cincinnati, OH | "If you don't have the source, it's not software" -- To unsubscribe, send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with subject unsubscribe. For more details, see http://www.afterstep.org.