Re: [As-users] AfterStep 2.0 beta4 release

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christer_Th=F6rn?= (
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:35:37 +0100

Vae wrote:

> All this, to gain *NOTHING*, and to *BREAK* certain things we have in 
> place for copatibility.
> Furthermore, you can't use a configure tag to rename data files 
> referenced by xml.  Or perhaps I should say, don't want to.  It would be 
> a large, and very ugly hack.

All right then, there's perfectly good, valid reasons not to do this, 
case closed. Why weren't these reasons presented in the first place, 
rather than talking about users level of proficiency, right vs. normal, 
Unix vs. Windows, etc.?

As-users mailing list