Re: [As-users] aterm and fflush()

Pierre Maziere (
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:26:21 +0100 (CET)

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Sasha Vasko wrote:

> Problem si present with latest beta as well.
> Essentially what's happening is that you write stuff too fast. If you 
> increase delay - it all looks much better. But with the small delay too much 
> input overwhelms aterm, at its safety logic, that prevents too many updates 
> to screen, kicks in. This logic was calculated to only work well with many a 
> \n chars, but not \r. I improved that now and if you were to try out aterm1 
> from cvs you should see an improvement. So next beta will have your problem 
> fixed. For now try increasing delay to more sensible value :)

I've just downloaded the latest cvs version (and compiled it without 
afterstep2 installed) and everything behaves as with xterm now.


As-users mailing list